Perhaps
it is French laicité , a concept
going back to the French revolution, that is behind this regular screwing up of
the pre-Christmas period by French unions. December seems to be the month, in
which they like to make life miserable for their own countryfolk and terrorise
whoever is in power.
On
a more serious note, it must also be the French revolution that explains the
mega-aggression, whenever the French go on strikes. Blocking the roads throughout
the country is standard. Some years ago, I read that a French historian
explained the difference in striking patterns between France, where strike
action often precedes negotiations, and other countries, in which strikes will be
undertaken when negotiations fail. The French are proud of their
revolution and consequently there seems to be more acceptance of violent
behaviour to further one’s aims. Guillotine anyone?
The
latest strikes have come about to prevent Macron’s government from going ahead
with its plans to reform the pension system. I can well understand the
frustration of many, who feel that the rich are getting richer, whilst they are
facing old-age with not much bread and definitely no cakes.
They
are right but preventing a reform in the pension system will not put the burden
on the rich. It will simply pass the burden to the next generation: that is, to
the children of those who are striking. Is that what the strikers want?
I happen to share your analysis on most issues over the last year.
ReplyDelete