A month ago Brussels Airlines announced
that, further to requests by Palestinian passengers, it had stopped offering a
sweet (Halva), as it was produced in the Occupied Territories.
I personally think that products manufactured
by the occupying Israelis in the West Bank should indeed be boycotted. The
Israeli government – not surprisingly – does not share this view of mine. Moreover,
Israel is evidently stronger than the Palestinian lobby and the airline has now
announced that it has changed its decision and that said Halva will be
available again.
In the campaign to pressurise Brussels
Airlines, Israel activated Diaspora Jews and soon, claims that the airline was
“giving in to racism” and about anti-Semitism could be found on social media.
Whatever one’s views about Israeli settlements and occupation, it is outrageous
and dishonest to suggest that boycotting products made by occupier owned
companies is giving in to racism or anti-Semitic.
What, if not antisemitism, prompted Brussels Airlines to forbid - of
ReplyDeleteall the innocent things on earth - halva?
Who ever heard of a boycott of Tibetan carpets (Tibet occupied by
China), or of Crimean sparkling wine (Crimea annexed by Russia), to
name but two instances?