Both sides are feeding us spin. The American
administration, through all avenues open to it, is explaining why the Vienna
agreement - that will bring an end to the sanctions on Iran - is the best we
can all hope for. In Israel, virtually the whole of the political class -
including the parties that call themselves opposition - are briefing against.
Netanyahu is the leader of the doomsday evangelists. And yet, you get some of the most senior of Israel’s defence
and security experts (including some former heads of Mossad and of the Shin Bet,
Israel’s internal security service) explaining that the agreement with Iran is
in fact good for Israel.
So what to think? Trying to form a view is
probably impossible. At the end of the day most of believe what fits our
worldview and what we want to believe.
In matters pertaining to risk assessment I
tend to have more faith in security experts than in politicians of the extreme
right, or any politician in fact. You cannot expect a politician to forget his
or her ideological convictions. Indeed, most will not hesitate to lie, to
promote their political stance.
Netanyahu has a long track record of lying to mislead his listeners, including in his speeches to the US Congress. That makes him and his flock of message repeating ministers and spokesmen worthless. Not irrelevant – as people do listen to what official Israel is saying – but definitely not trustworthy.
Netanyahu has a long track record of lying to mislead his listeners, including in his speeches to the US Congress. That makes him and his flock of message repeating ministers and spokesmen worthless. Not irrelevant – as people do listen to what official Israel is saying – but definitely not trustworthy.
What you say about politicians is true by all appearances
ReplyDeleteWhat you say about security experts clearly isn`t:
They are by no means free from ideologies, career dreams (especially in Israel) or personal animosities.
Their views tend to be slanted, quite independently of their expertise in security matters.